Advertise on CBF

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: 'Timeless' Test  (Read 1566 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

langer17

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1977
  • Trade Count: (0)
'Timeless' Test
« on: July 19, 2011, 04:30:53 AM »

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/content/current/story/523745.html

Seems interesting, but I don't think they should do it.
Logged

stevie_94_

  • First XI Captain
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 186
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2011, 11:04:44 AM »

Why not? Surely if its a final its better to have a result rather than someone win based on who scored more in the first innings or something
Logged

mdl_1979

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 796
  • Trade Count: (+5)
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2011, 11:08:04 AM »

A timeless test for the World Championship Final is a great idea, if they aren't going to make the final a series. At least we would get a winner.
Logged

rp27

  • County 1st XI
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 960
  • Trade Count: (+2)
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2011, 11:09:54 AM »

Why not? Surely if its a final its better to have a result rather than someone win based on who scored more in the first innings or something
Because he knows if it's timeless the aussies arent going to win it! ;)
Logged
A pessimist is never disappointed.

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10677
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2011, 11:10:41 AM »

I think it's a great idea, but, and here's the big but, the ICC will be extremely worried that after four days the audiences will tail off and the cost of running the match will outweigh the value of having a test champion in marketing terms. Especially if India aren't in it.
Logged

langer17

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1977
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2011, 11:18:30 AM »

Why not? Surely if its a final its better to have a result rather than someone win based on who scored more in the first innings or something

I just think that with the 5 day test, teams know that they have 5 days to win, lose or draw so it adds some urgency to the games, especially on days 4 and 5. Without a 'time' limit, the game will just go through the motions untill someone wins, with no real excitement as you know that someone has to win, whereas with a game that has a time limit you don't know if it will be a win, loss or draw.
Logged

Lekka Global Alliance

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1343
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2011, 11:56:34 AM »

Make it a 900 over game.
Logged

Kulli

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4506
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Herr Kaleun
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2011, 12:11:49 PM »

Wasn't that world XI vs Oz game a few years ago 6 days?
Logged
They won't catch us this time! Not this time! They haven't spotted us! No, they're all snoring in their bunks! Or, you know what? They're drinking at the bar, celebrating our sinking! Not yet, my friends. Not yet!

Apple

  • Guest
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2011, 02:49:46 PM »

I dont think you can have that, because the whole game changes if you don't have to win within 5 days, if you make the final timeless then you have to make every game timeless.
Logged

tommo256

  • World Cup Winner
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3007
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2011, 02:57:51 PM »

There will be batsmen im sure we English to count on to be there, Jonathon trott, would be good to have Boycott back to block out in a timeless test
Logged
If you put men on the rope, bet you 100 quid I'll still take your right arm dross on!

Lekka Global Alliance

  • International Captain
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1343
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2011, 03:13:51 PM »

I may need to double check but have the ICC just suggested a "timeless test match" only 2 weeks after banning runners ?
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10677
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2011, 03:18:02 PM »

I may need to double check but have the ICC just suggested a "timeless test match" only 2 weeks after banning runners ?
Yup, on the basis that as you injure yourself, the duration of the game shortens...
Logged

jonwilson

  • Club Cricketer
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 84
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2011, 04:53:47 PM »

I just think that with the 5 day test, teams know that they have 5 days to win, lose or draw so it adds some urgency to the games, especially on days 4 and 5. Without a 'time' limit, the game will just go through the motions untill someone wins, with no real excitement as you know that someone has to win, whereas with a game that has a time limit you don't know if it will be a win, loss or draw.

Would agree.  No sense of urgency would make the game just so unbelievably dull.  Just imagine a nice flat batting track.  Extremely likely that the side winning the toss and batting first would win.  Bat and bat and bat etc.  To quote Neville Cardus (as quoted in the Guardian);

 "In the future, reports will begin 'so-and-so won the toss but it cannot be said they made full use of the first fortnight."

 I think the idea of a timeless test is actually quite dangerous in terms of Test Cricket.  Runs the risk of it making a mockery out of the game and people would simply pull the plug. 
Logged

tim2000s

  • Administrator
  • International Superstar
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10677
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • If I only could bat....
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2011, 04:58:21 PM »

I actually like the idea of playing a 450 over match, with each side having a maximum of 225 overs to win, over two innings...

But it's not a test match if you play it like that... It's just a different form of limited overs cricket as you know you will win or lose dependent on the outcome at the end of 450 overs.
Logged

Apple

  • Guest
Re: 'Timeless' Test
« Reply #14 on: July 19, 2011, 05:10:47 PM »

Draws can be some of the most exciting and intresting games in test cricket. If its a draw just share the title!
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
 

Advertise on CBF